
- 23 Jul 2025 R (on the application of Hall-Chung) v Parole Board of England and Wales – Successful challenge to a decision of the Parole Board on a ‘mistake of fact’ basis.
- 04 Jul 2025 R (on the application of Ellis) v Secretary of State for Justice – Case before the court of appeal concerning Article 2 protocol 1 rights (education) when in custody.
- 26 Jun 2025 Kane Vs Parole Board for England and Wales – A challenge to the decision of the Parole Board wherein no direction for release was made. Predicated mainly on the submission that there was a mistake of fact. Claim dismissed.
- 25 Jun 2025 Cox (Review of Tariff) Re. – application for High Court Tariff review
- 19 Jun 2025 R(Nguyen) v Secretary of State for Justice [2025] EWHC 2024 (Admin) – unsuccessful JR of a decision to recall a life sentenced prisoner. C was previously recalled on allegations of breaching his alcohol monitoring tag. The Parole Board held that his recall was unlawful and directed his release.
- 18 Jun 2025 Catley, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2025] EWHC 1507 (Admin) (18 June 2025) – JR of the Secretary of State’s rejection of the PB recommendation for transfer to open conditions refused. The reasons given were adequate and behaviour post-dating the Board’s decision could be taken into account without referring the case back to the Board.
- 13 Jun 2025 Tompson, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Justice [2025] EWHC 1471 (Admin) (13 June 1225) – a successful challenge to refusal by SSJ to accept PB’s open recommendation – where the failure to re-refer the case for a further oral hearing to consider new material was held to be unlawful.
- 04 Jun 2025 Murcott, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2025] – Failure to grant oral hearing challenge, not to be confused with the case of Murcott determined earlier this year. Rejection of cat A application lawful.
- 23 Apr 2025 R (on the application of AA) v Parole Board for England and Wales – regarding the grant (or otherwise) of an oral hearing whilst fresh allegations leading to recall remain open and being investigated.